The term “rural vs. urban telephone subscriber” describes how telecom customers are grouped according to where they live; subscribers in rural areas and less developed areas are classified as rural subscribers, while those in towns and cities are classified as urban subscribers. The spread of telecommunication services between rural and urban areas is highlighted by this metric. Because it offers information on the digital divide, access to communication infrastructure, and the inclusivity of telecom penetration across various demographic groupings, tracking it is extremely relevant. Because of their superior infrastructure, higher incomes, and more demand for digital services, urban areas typically have higher subscription rates than rural ones, which frequently fall behind because of issues with pricing and connectivity. Policymakers and regulators can detect access gaps, create focused interventions, and assess the success of programs like Digital India and rural broadband projects by keeping an eye on rural versus urban subscriber rates. It provides companies with information about prospective growth markets and chances to extend communication services in underserved areas. All things considered, this metric is essential for evaluating fair digital growth, closing connectivity disparities, and encouraging inclusive socioeconomic development.